RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Surgical repair techniques and management of patients with atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) have progressed over the last few decades. Early and definitive interventions have become the choice of treatment for these patients. Based on this background, we aimed to review the early and mid-term outcomes of primary AVSD repair. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 3.45 ± 5.67 years underwent definitive repair for AVSD between January 2014 and June 2021. The clinical data including age, type of defect, associated co-anomalies, symptoms, pulmonary hypertension, etc. were collected and assessed retrospectively. Mitral regurgitation (MR) as a clinical outcome was assessed at 0, 1, 2, and 5 years. RESULTS: Among the recruited patients, 35 (66.1%) were male and 18 (33.9%) were female. Of 53 patients, repair for the complete defect was done in 38 (71.69%) patients, repair for intermediate/partial defect was done in 15 (23.1%) patients, and one patient underwent repair for incomplete type. Other associated co-anomalies were anterior mitral leaflet (12 (22.6%)), atrial and ventricular septal defect (VSD) (30 (56.6%)), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (11 (20.8%)). Different procedures for surgical repair included patch closure, cleft repair, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) VSD closure. After repair, the mean follow-up period was 46.73 ± 27.37 months. Overall mortality was 3.78% (2/53), and two patients underwent reintervention due to symptomatic severe MR. CONCLUSIONS: A definitive and timely correction of AVSD shows satisfactory early and mid-term results.
RESUMO
The surgical treatment options for pediatric aortic valve disease are limited and have debatable long-term durability. In the current situation, the Ross procedure is considered in children for aortic valve disease(s). It is a complex surgical procedure with the risk of neo-aortic dilatation, converting a single valve disease into double valve disease, and associated with future re-interventions. Conversely, the Ozaki procedure has shown promising results in adults. Thus, the present study aimed to provide comparative evidence on the effectiveness and safety of the Ozaki versus Ross procedure for pediatric patients by performing a meta-analytic comparison of reporting outcomes. A total of 15 relevant articles were downloaded and among them, seven articles (one prospective study, five retrospective studies, and one case series) were used in the analysis. Primary outcomes such as physiological laminar flow pattern and hemodynamic parameters, and secondary outcomes such as hospital stays, adverse effects, mortality, and numbers of re-intervention(s) were measured in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the age of patients between children who underwent the Ozaki procedure and those who underwent the Ross procedure at the time of surgeries. The Ozaki procedure is a good solution to an aortic problem(s) similar to the Ross procedure. Unlike the Ross procedure, the Ozaki procedure has restored a physiological laminar flow pattern in the short-term follow-up without the bi-valvular disease. Mean hospital stays (p = 0.048), mean follow-up (p = 0.02), adverse effects (p = 0.02), death, and numbers of re-intervention(s) of children who underwent the Ozaki procedure were fewer than those who underwent the Ross procedure. The time required for re-intervention(s) is higher for children who underwent the Ozaki procedure than those who underwent the Ross procedure. None of the procedures, including the Ozaki procedure for aortic valve disease(s), has significant effects on hemodynamic parameters and the frequent death rate of children after surgeries. Based on our analysis, we may suggest the Ozaki procedure for aortic valve disease surgery in children.
